![]() One begins a breakfast and the other finishes it. ![]() After the babies have been switched and the premise has been set up, far too much time is spent with the futile manipulation of the four characters in the hotel. The fundamental problems of the movie all can be traced, I suspect, back to the screenplay. The Jupiter Hollow Midler seems unfocused, and both Tomlins seem to be the same rather vague woman who has trouble with her shoulderpads. The most promising character probably is Sadie Shelton, Midler’s New York company executive, who has the potential to be a bitch on wheels but never realizes it. Midler and Tomlin can be funny actors, but here they both seem muted and toned down in all of the characters they play. The life all seems to have escaped from this movie. The impending sale inspires the Jupiter Hollow women to travel up north to New York for the annual stockholder’s meeting of the company controlled by the Manhattan women.īoth sets of women check into the Plaza Hotel at the same time, inspiring numerous flat and tedious scenes that are structured as if they were intended to be slapstick. Meanwhile, the New York Midler wants to sell out the factory and the town to a shifty Italian investor who wants to strip-mine the whole county right off the map. They work in the local factory, which has manufactured porch swings from time immemorial. ![]() But the Midler/Tomlin team from down South in Jupiter Hollow is a little nicer. Both Midlers are conniving and materialistic, and both Tomlins are flutter-brained and well-meaning. “PEOPLE OF THE WORLD! My tweet about women was a response to this fascinating and well written piece in the NYT on July 3rd,” she began the Twitter thread, referring to the opinion piece titled " The Far Right and Far Left Agree on One Thing: Women Don't Count." In the essay, author Pamela Paul makes the argument that “the word ‘women’ has become verboten” and that liberal institutions are working “to deny women their humanity, reducing them to a mix of body parts and gender stereotypes.” Midler insists, “There was no intention of anything exclusionary or transphobic in what I said it wasn’t about that.In its presentation of the two sets of non-twins, the movie backs genetics rather than environment as the prime formative factor in human development. However, on Tuesday, Midler returned to Twitter to clarify her stance on the subject in a series of tweets, stating definitively that she never intended to make any sort of harmful statement against the transgender community. Terms such as “pregnant or menstruating people” have started being used instead of “pregnant or menstruating women” as a way of acknowledging that transgender and nonbinary people are also effected by issues like access to reproductive care. ![]() On Monday, the actor tweeted a controversial opinion, proclaiming, “WOMEN OF THE WORLD! We are being stripped of our rights over our bodies, our lives and even of our name! They don’t call us ‘women’ anymore they call us ‘birthing people’ or ‘menstruators,’ and even ‘people with vaginas’! Don’t let them erase you! Every human on earth owes you!” That statement prompted backlash from many social media users who highlighted this rhetoric as a talking point often used by anti-trans individuals. Bette Midler is setting the record straight about her claim earlier this week that the use of trans-inclusive languages “erases” the identity of cis women. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |